<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>clock  ...  watching time, the only true currency &#187; Visualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/category/visualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock</link>
	<description>A journal from John B. Roberts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The geographic center of baseball</title>
		<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2008/02/21/the-geographic-center-of-baseball/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2008/02/21/the-geographic-center-of-baseball/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2008/02/21/the-geographic-center-of-baseball/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve never heard of Alex Reisner before today. My gratitude to Adam Kalsey for the link. I just now realized that Reisner&#8217;s post is from March of 2006, almost 2 years ago. But this is timeless, not timely. What a marvelous, brief examination of history and its forces: Baseball Geography and Transportation. Effectively annotated with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never heard of <a href="http://alexreisner.com/">Alex Reisner</a> before today. My gratitude to <a href="http://kalsey.com/2008/02/daily_reading_from_february_20_2008/">Adam Kalsey</a> for the link. I just now realized that Reisner&#8217;s post is from March of 2006, almost <strong>2 years</strong> ago. But this is timeless, not timely.</p>
<p>What a marvelous, brief examination of history and its forces: <a href="http://alexreisner.com/baseball/history/geotrans">Baseball Geography and Transportation</a>. Effectively annotated with dated maps, in an almost schematic method, this article demonstrates the changes wrought on baseball by the move from trains to planes and automobiles. Both the distribution of teams and the shapes of stadiums were disrupted by travel methods. Obvious when you think about it&#8230;but I never have.</p>
<p>This is one article I would like to see expanded and fleshed out a bit more. Compare Reisner&#8217;s effort to this <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200803/road-rail-air-networks">two-page spread</a> in The Atlantic. Reisner did the hard work of making connections, and forcefully making his point with his illustrations. A touch more work and this goes from remarkable to simply outstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2008/02/21/the-geographic-center-of-baseball/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday night links</title>
		<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2007/12/23/sunday-night-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2007/12/23/sunday-night-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 04:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2007/12/23/sunday-night-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I&#8217;m disappointed with our Sony digital camera, I pay attention to roundups like this one: &#8220;Looking beyond megapixels&#8221; But I get annoyed when the links leading to the NYTimes branded version of CNET don&#8217;t lead straight to the right camera, though. The Fujifilm FinePix f50fd looks like a possibility. (I wasn&#8217;t impressed that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I&#8217;m disappointed with our Sony digital camera, I pay attention to roundups like this one: &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/06/technology/personaltech/06pogue.html">Looking beyond megapixels</a>&#8221; But I get annoyed when the links leading to the NYTimes branded version of CNET don&#8217;t lead straight to the right camera, though. The <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-cameras/fujifilm-finepix-f50fd/4505-6501_7-32514555.html?tag=prod.txt.2">Fujifilm FinePix f50fd</a> looks like a possibility. (I wasn&#8217;t impressed that the site crashed Safari on my second click.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read much Wallace Stegner, but not his <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200711u/current-history#history">Discovery! The Search for Arabian Oil</a> (scroll to the bottom). A future read, certainly.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t need <a href="http://www.43folders.com/2007/11/29/adventures-40-eyeglasses">Adventures in $40 eyeglasses</a> right now, but for the future&#8230;</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t watched <strong>The Kingdom</strong>, but the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKppKRnM7cU">opening credits sequence</a> is nifty. (<a href="http://infosthetics.com/archives/2007/12/the_kingdom_movie_opening_sequence.html">via</a>)</p>
<p>The best <a href="http://sippey.typepad.com/filtered/2007/12/a-picture-1000.html">10 books of the year</a>? So says <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/books/review/10-best-2007.html">The New York Times</a> in its 2007 list. Despite my reading, I never even came close to one of this group, and had only heard of two.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t pour myself into Twitter, but I recognize that&#8217;s its very open-endedness is a strength. What caught my eye about this <a href="http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2007/12/why-is-twitter.html">analysis</a> was simply its method: pictures and diagrams, in lieu of many words. My education continues.</p>
<p>Who has time to read <a href="http://business-model-design.blogspot.com/2007/12/draft-business-model-innovation-manual.html">Draft Business Model Innovation Manual (beta version)</a>? Not me, and I haven&#8217;t even downloaded the PDF, but I love the audacity of someone creating a manual for innovation. Clayton Christensen has <strong>described</strong> innovation and its consequences on businesses wonderfully. But a &#8220;manual&#8221; implies prescription, which is much, much harder.</p>
<p>Among the least surprising headlines of the year, from December 4, 2007: &#8220;Hybrid Vehicle Owners are Wealthy, Active, Educated and Overwhelmingly Democratic, According to Scarborough Research&#8221; (PDF available from <a href="http://www.scarborough.com/press.php">press page</a>)</p>
<p>Domains are interesting to me. I have seven of my own, though I only use one. DomainTools <a href="http://blog.domaintools.com/2007/12/free-registrant-search/">introduced</a> &#8220;<a href="http://www.domaintools.com/registrant-search/">Registrant Search</a>,&#8221; with an offer of a free self-search. Yup&#8230;found them all. But I don&#8217;t try and hide.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a sucker for things like this: &#8220;<a href="http://goodexperience.com/blog/archives/010202.php">human history in 60 seconds</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://joejackson.com/">Joe Jackson</a> is starting another tour and will be in Redwood City in May 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2007/12/23/sunday-night-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book: Beautiful Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/09/13/book-beautiful-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/09/13/book-beautiful-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Formats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/09/13/book-beautiful-evidence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I pre-ordered Edward Tufte&#8217;s Beautiful Evidence from Amazon. After reading two of his earlier books (I own Visual Display), I was looking forward to his first in years. Bottom line&#8230; the book is beautifully made, and two chapters shine, but this tome feels more like a collection of uneven essays than the tour-de-force of his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pre-ordered Edward Tufte&#8217;s <a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_be">Beautiful Evidence</a> from Amazon. After reading two of his earlier books (I own <i>Visual Display</i>), I was looking forward to his first in years. Bottom line&#8230; the book is beautifully made, and two chapters shine, but this tome feels more like a collection of uneven essays than the tour-de-force of his earlier volumes.</p>
<p>The chapters I enjoyed?</p>
<p>The one on <a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0001OR&#038;topic_id=1'">sparklines</a>, which wasn&#8217;t a new concept for me, given the lengthy web discussion of same, but since I haven&#8217;t read that entire forum, the edited version was most welcome.</p>
<p>The evisceration of <a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0001yB&#038;topic_id=1">PowerPoint</a> was a guilty pleasure. I&#8217;ve long felt frustrated by the format, and this was simply backing for my previously held biases (<a href="http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2004/04/22/clicktoaddtitlecom/">1</a>, <a href="http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2004/03/31/everyone-has-to-read-shirky/">2</a>). Two full pages are simply a paper version of Peter Norvig&#8217;s brilliant <a href="http://www.norvig.com/Gettysburg/">Gettysburg address</a>. Note: Anil Dash has often <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2003/11/25/tools_affect_co">written interesting material about business software</a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t created a &#8220;deck&#8221; since joining <a href="http://www.opendns.com/">OpenDNS</a>. I&#8217;m pleased with that fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/09/13/book-beautiful-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Machine&#8230;a popular version of Lifestreams?</title>
		<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/08/08/time-machinea-popular-version-of-lifestreams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/08/08/time-machinea-popular-version-of-lifestreams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/08/08/time-machinea-popular-version-of-lifestreams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday&#8217;s sneak peek at Leopard, the next version of Mac OS X, included Time Machine. This archive/journaling/backup application has a nifty UI, at least in demo mode. We&#8217;ll have to wait to see if it&#8217;s actually useful or not, but it sells well. But what I was struck by was that Time Machine appears to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday&#8217;s sneak peek at Leopard, the next version of Mac OS X, included <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/timemachine.html">Time Machine</a>. This archive/journaling/backup application has a nifty UI, at least in demo mode. We&#8217;ll have to wait to see if it&#8217;s actually useful or not, but it sells well.</p>
<p>But what I was struck by was that Time Machine appears to be the first popular evocation of <a href="http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/freeman/lifestreams.html">Lifestreams</a>, the Eric Freeman and David Gelertner attempt to replace the desktop metaphor from a decade ago. By popular, I mean something that people will actually see and (maybe) use. Gelertner&#8217;s software company MirrorWorlds appears to have slipped away, and the domain leads to a parked page. So does Scopeware, which was the name of the company in 2003, when I last <a href="http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2003/06/18/skip-the-essay-check-out/">noticed this idea in the wild</a>.</p>
<p>I wonder if the ideas really are close enough that Apple had to license any patents?</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> I was not the only one to make this comparison.</p>
<ul>
<li>Steven Berlin Johnson: <a href="http://www.stevenberlinjohnson.com/2006/08/apple_apple_mac.html">Leopard First Impressions: The Time Machine</a></li>
<li>Dave5: <a href="http://www.saintzeno.com/blog/2006/08/08/wwdc-a-very-scrabble-christmas">WWDC &#8211; A Very Scrabble Christmas</a> (see the footnote)</li>
<li>Dave Rogers: <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/dave_rogers/GHD08-06.html#note_2947">Mac: Seeing Spots</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/08/08/time-machinea-popular-version-of-lifestreams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The web, a decade ago, when it was still measurable</title>
		<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/07/06/the-web-a-decade-ago-when-it-was-still-measurable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/07/06/the-web-a-decade-ago-when-it-was-still-measurable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/07/06/the-web-a-decade-ago-when-it-was-still-measurable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Bray resurrects a presentation he gave in May, 1996 entitled &#8220;Measuring the Web.&#8221; A worthy part of history, and now it will be preserved in various caches for&#8230; well, a long time. Some of the sites named are long gone, and no longer well known. Infoseek, for example, where I interviewed in December, 1996, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Bray <a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/07/06/Measuring-The-Web">resurrects</a> a presentation he gave in May, 1996 entitled &#8220;<a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/199x/1996/05/07/OVERVIEW.HTM">Measuring the Web</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>A worthy part of history, and now it will be preserved in various caches for&#8230; well, a long time. Some of the sites named are long gone, and no longer well known. Infoseek, for example, where I interviewed in December, 1996, when it was a rising star. Infoseek&#8217;s location, a 45 minute drive  from San Francisco at off-peak hours, ruled it out by the time I arrived at the building. Some things work out for the best!</p>
<p>In the presentation, there are two tidbits I&#8217;m curious about that don&#8217;t get explained in Figure 7, Most Lumous Sites (those that link out). The right-hand side of the graph is titled Sites With Pointers from: x1000. The second largest site, after Yahoo, is listed only as an IP address: 197.160.127.201 I wonder what that site was? A reverse DNS lookup tells me nothing, since DNSStuff.com says <tt>Asking f.root-servers.net for 201.127.160.197.in-addr.arpa PTR record:  Sorry, there is no such zone!</tt> On the left-hand side of the graph, Outgoing URLs, x1000, there is a different IP address just over halfway down: 198.147.102.253 Looking that one up via reverse DNS gets caught in a loop, so I&#8217;m going to have to remain curious for both of them, or hope that Bray remembers what they might have been and provides an update.</p>
<p>Some of the graphics carry a lot of information, despite their somewhat crude edges. I expect Matthew Hurst would have fun with the original data set (if it still existed), given what he&#8217;s showing in <a href="http://datamining.typepad.com/gallery/blog-map-gallery.html">exercises like his map of the blogosphere</a>. These pictures don&#8217;t always convey all we&#8217;d hope, but more fun than words, and visually appealing, too. I have Tufte&#8217;s newest, <a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_be">Beautiful Evidence</a>, on order from Amazon. I can&#8217;t make beautiful or information-full pictures, but I do enjoy poring over them.</p>
<p>If you do find the written history of technology appealing, don&#8217;t forget about <a href="http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/03/15/book-how-the-web-was-born/">How the Web Was Born</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/07/06/the-web-a-decade-ago-when-it-was-still-measurable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC News offers live stats</title>
		<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/06/13/bbc-news-offers-live-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/06/13/bbc-news-offers-live-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/06/13/bbc-news-offers-live-stats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good for the BBC: BBC News live stats At CNET News.com, What&#8217;s Hot is updated with data hourly, and when new stories are published. Some of the Most Popular data is updated in near-real-time, though most is daily. For so-close-to-real-time it becomes useless (but still interesting), try Digg Spy. Showing usage back to the users&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for the BBC: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/newsid_5070000/newsid_5071700/5071754.stm">BBC News live stats</a></p>
<p>At CNET News.com, <a href="http://hot.news.com/">What&#8217;s Hot</a> is updated with data hourly, and when new stories are published. Some of the <a href="http://news.com.com/2240-10755_3-0.html?tag=clock">Most Popular</a> data is updated in near-real-time, though most is daily.</p>
<p>For so-close-to-real-time it becomes useless (but still interesting), try <a href="http://digg.com/spy/">Digg Spy</a>.</p>
<p>Showing usage back to the users&#8230; that&#8217;s fun stuff. And it definitely changes behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/06/13/bbc-news-offers-live-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are there any successes in the analog displays of digital information?</title>
		<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/06/06/are-there-any-successes-in-the-analog-displays-of-digital-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/06/06/are-there-any-successes-in-the-analog-displays-of-digital-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 04:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my worst purchases ever? The Ambient Executive Dashboard. This device, with its three faceplates, and swinging indicators, promised to open up analog, real-world display of information which is normally constrained (not locked) in digital arenas. The problems? First, the device&#8217;s wireless coverage was miserable, in an office building in the heart of San [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my worst purchases ever? The <a href="http://www.ambientdevices.com/cat/dashboard/index.html">Ambient Executive Dashboard</a>. This device, with its three faceplates, and swinging indicators, promised to open up analog, real-world display of information which is normally constrained (not locked) in digital arenas.</p>
<p>The problems?</p>
<p>First, the device&#8217;s wireless coverage was miserable, in an office building in the heart of San Francisco&#8217;s business district. My indicators would either not move or swing inconsistently.</p>
<p>Second, the 30 <a href="http://www.ambientdevices.com/cat/dashboard/facecards.html">included faceplates</a> are for non-personal information, like weather, traffic, and market indices. Weather and market indices are mildly interesting, but traffic isn&#8217;t generic&#8230; which route, etc.</p>
<p>Third, the basic device cost $150.</p>
<p>Fourth, the opportunities to customize what information was displayed were limited. You can pay extra for some faceplates which can be tailored via a dedicated website (# of Yahoo Mail messages, etc.), but true personalization is not available. I bought this device well over a year ago, and even today, the developer specifications are still &#8220;<a href="http://www.ambientdevices.com/developer/index.html">in preparation</a>&#8221; &#8212; that was the case when I bought the device, too.</p>
<p>When I left CNET last month, I left the Ambient Executive Dashboard behind. I hope someone else either found a better use for it or threw it away.</p>
<p>I was reminded of my wasted money when I saw mention a few weeks ago of <a href="http://www.violet.net/index_us.jsp">Violet</a>, a French company whose tagline is &#8220;The Smart Object Company.&#8221; As long as a device is seen as a toy, or a fashion object, I suppose Violet may deliver up to (lower) expectations, with a digital &#8220;<a href="http://www.nabaztag.com/vl/FR/nabaztag_whois.jsp">rabbit</a>.&#8221; At least Violet <a href="http://www.nabaztag.com/vl/FR/aideDetails.jsp?cat=Developer%20Zone">offers an API</a> (look on the right, for a link to the, sigh, PDF).</p>
<p>Ambient and Velvet are among the few companies I know of that are innovating on analog displays of digital information. I haven&#8217;t searched/shopped around, so maybe I&#8217;m missing entire industries (not just companies) who are delivering great products and services in this category. Am I? I hope so.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s something marvelous about the concept, so although I&#8217;ve been burned once, I&#8217;m still anxious for someone to amaze me. Think about how many digital displays mimic analog displays because of the comfort and immediate comprehension which results. We&#8217;re seeing a promise of more realistic analog control of digital devices with new products like the Nintendo Wii, with its motion-sensitive system (<a href="http://news.com.com/2300-1043_3-6070295-2.html">photo</a>). So there is hope for the reverse&#8230; digital control of analog displays. Yes, our planes are turning into &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_flight_control_systems">fly by wire</a>,&#8221; but I&#8217;m looking more in the personal gadget realm.</p>
<p>Digital displays themselves open new possibilities, of course, at times far beyond what you can do with analog devices. I still hope that CNET News.com does more with <a href="http://hot.news.com/">What&#8217;s Hot</a>, for instance.</p>
<p>But we&#8217;re all still human, with more senses than just sight and sound, so engage us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/06/06/are-there-any-successes-in-the-analog-displays-of-digital-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WebsitesAsGraphs &#8211; Visualization of clock&#8217;s HTML source code</title>
		<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/05/28/websitesasgraphs-visualization-of-clocks-html-source-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/05/28/websitesasgraphs-visualization-of-clocks-html-source-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 03:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/?p=1023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Click the thumbnail for full-size.) I don&#8217;t know what this picture says about my blog&#8217;s structure, but I&#8217;m interested in different visualization efforts all the same. Here, clock&#8216;s HTML source as a graph, courtesy of Sala. No last name given, but let&#8217;s assume the aharef in the domain is a last name until we learn [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/wp-content/clockAsGraph.jpg"><img src='http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/wp-content/thumb-clockAsGraph.jpg' width='200' height='200' alt='Thumbnail of clock's HTML source visualized: websitesasgraphs" align='left' /></a> (Click the thumbnail for full-size.) I don&#8217;t know what this picture says about my blog&#8217;s structure, but I&#8217;m interested in different visualization efforts all the same. Here, <a href="http://www.aharef.info/static/htmlgraph/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pencoyd.com%2Fclock%2F"><i>clock</i>&#8216;s HTML source as a graph</a>, courtesy of Sala. No last name given, but let&#8217;s assume the <i>aharef</i> in the domain is a last name until we learn otherwise. Make your own <a href="http://www.aharef.info/static/htmlgraph/">via the form on this page</a>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.aharef.info/2006/05/websites_as_graphs.htm">original post from the author</a>, which I found via <a href="http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/003754.php#003754">Information Design</a>. I&#8217;ve already seen this meme picked up by another feed I read, and I expect it will spiral widely.</p>
<p>What will help it spread? First, it&#8217;s visual. Second, there is a unique flickr tag: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/websitesasgraphs/">websitesasgraphs</a>. Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pencoyd/155168339/">my contribution</a> to the tag.</p>
<p>Because I&#8217;ll lose track otherwise, here&#8217;s the <strong>Legend</strong>.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000099; font-weight: bold">blue</span>: for links (the A tag)<br /><span style="color: #ff0000; font-weight: bold">red</span>: for tables (TABLE, TR and TD tags)<br /><span style="color: #009900; font-weight: bold">green</span>: for the DIV tag<br /><span style="color: #cc00ff; font-weight: bold">violet</span>: for images (the IMG tag)<br /><span style="color: #ffff33; font-weight: bold">yellow</span>: for forms (FORM, INPUT, TEXTAREA, SELECT and OPTION tags)<br /><span style="color: #ff9933; font-weight: bold">orange</span>: for linebreaks and blockquotes (BR, P, and BLOCKQUOTE tags)<br /><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: bold">black</span>: the HTML tag, the root node<br /><span style="color: #999999; font-weight: bold">gray</span>: all other tags</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/05/28/websitesasgraphs-visualization-of-clocks-html-source-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

