<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie: The Departed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/10/15/movie-the-departed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/10/15/movie-the-departed/</link>
	<description>A journal from John B. Roberts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/10/15/movie-the-departed/comment-page-1/#comment-4592</link>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 04:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/10/15/movie-the-departed/#comment-4592</guid>
		<description>You always round down = conservative, but probably the right call in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You always round down = conservative, but probably the right call in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narendra</title>
		<link>http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/10/15/movie-the-departed/comment-page-1/#comment-4565</link>
		<dc:creator>Narendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 03:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencoyd.com/clock/2006/10/15/movie-the-departed/#comment-4565</guid>
		<description>I was getting ready to review The Departed as well and it got me thinking about what methodology I would use to review anything. After a bunch of thought, I have settled on 4 stars (4 = classic and requires several viewings, 3 = good to great movie, always entertaining, 2 = entertainment or why we go to the movies and even a bad movie might have some redeeming value like absurdity, 1 = just not worth anyone&#039;s time).

The Departed poses a bit of a problem for me because I have rarely differed in opinion with a movie that is very high on Metacritic or Rotten Tomatoes and in this case, I had some issues. Although I was pretty much captivated the entire time, I thought that a bunch of the violence took away from some fabulous acting.  For a movie that is based on a film out of Hong Kong, I thought the treatment of the Chinese gang was oddly stereotypical, and finally, the sequence at the end sort of just ruined it for me.  I didn&#039;t need a Hollywood ending, I just thought the writers copped out (no pun intended) and it left me flat.

So this should have been a definite 3 stars but it hasn&#039;t sat well and part of my scoring is that if a movie sits between any two levels, I need to round down.  Result: 2 stars with some great acting.

I will undoubtedly cut and paste this for my own blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was getting ready to review The Departed as well and it got me thinking about what methodology I would use to review anything. After a bunch of thought, I have settled on 4 stars (4 = classic and requires several viewings, 3 = good to great movie, always entertaining, 2 = entertainment or why we go to the movies and even a bad movie might have some redeeming value like absurdity, 1 = just not worth anyone&#8217;s time).</p>
<p>The Departed poses a bit of a problem for me because I have rarely differed in opinion with a movie that is very high on Metacritic or Rotten Tomatoes and in this case, I had some issues. Although I was pretty much captivated the entire time, I thought that a bunch of the violence took away from some fabulous acting.  For a movie that is based on a film out of Hong Kong, I thought the treatment of the Chinese gang was oddly stereotypical, and finally, the sequence at the end sort of just ruined it for me.  I didn&#8217;t need a Hollywood ending, I just thought the writers copped out (no pun intended) and it left me flat.</p>
<p>So this should have been a definite 3 stars but it hasn&#8217;t sat well and part of my scoring is that if a movie sits between any two levels, I need to round down.  Result: 2 stars with some great acting.</p>
<p>I will undoubtedly cut and paste this for my own blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
